Closet for Two

As an only child, I experienced a not-insignificant amount of wistful longing for a sibling while growing up. Above all, I wanted a sister – though, in truth, what I wanted was a built-in best friend. Because it’s hard to make friends when you’re an introvert and a teenager and your life is entirely uprooted not once but twice within the space of a few years. Of course, having a sibling is no guarantee of harmonious companionship, but I didn’t know that at the time, what with being an only child and having no friends. There is nothing to say that, had I had a sister, we would have (happily) shared the same interests or opinions. Much less the same closet, although I dreamed that dream for a long time. In any event, my idealized expectations of female bonding rituals, nourished by books, magazines, and TV, never had the chance to rub up against prosaic realities. My mom was never especially interested in fashion or makeup, and I never lived with roommates (until I met my husband, whose interest in those things is also essentially nil.) For more than 30 years, I was the undisputed queen of my realm. And by realm, I mean my closet. I loved fashion and I painstakingly built a little universe around it. OK, maybe not so little. And if there was nobody in my day-to-day life with whom I could share bits of that universe, well … that’s what this blog was for — whose added bonus is that none of you have ever asked to borrow a pair of shoes and forgotten to return it.

And then I had a daughter.

There were many reasons why, before she was born, I hoped to have a daughter. I wouldn’t say that they were bad reasons but, for the most part, those reasons are not the same reasons why, today, I am grateful that I have a daughter. Life teaches you things you had no idea that you didn’t know or understand – not just about the world and what’s important in it, but about yourself. (Maybe those are two sides of the same coin.) One of things I had hoped for, before my daughter was born, was that we might share the sort of connection that my mom and I didn’t really have when I was growing up – one forged in common interests and experiences. I knew that it wasn’t a given simply by virtue of biology, but that didn’t stop me from hoping it might happen.

The answer wasn’t obvious from the jump, as such things rarely are. One of the joys of parenthood has been watching my kids’ personalities slowly unfold before my eyes. As a parent, one’s role in that process is a curious one: not wholly a spectator, not unilaterally a director, often on the spot but never in the spotlight. Something of a Jill-of-all-trades, hoping always for the best and being frequently surprised by what ends up transpiring during the performance – because there’s no dress rehearsal, of course. Anyway, in the fullness of time, it became clear that I had been granted my wish. My daughter is a chip off the old block; that block being me, to be precise. She loves to draw and read, and her “happy place” is the library; she has a weakness for accessories and plans her outfit the night before. We are two peas in a pod.

Well, sort of.

One of the most emotionally fraught transitions of parenthood – less immediately tumultuous than the arrival of a brand-new human being in one’s life, but no less profound in consequence – is the emergence of boundaries. For the first few years of their lives, my kids felt as much a part of me as they had been while in utero. Like an extra appendage tacked onto my body, sometimes quite literally. I don’t know exactly when this started to change; it happened so gradually, I hardly noticed. But there came a day when it hit me: my kids are people. I know that sounds silly – what else would they be? – but the reality of that, as a parent, is different from the abstract concept. So, then: my daughter is a person, with her own opinions and her own perspective on things … including those things that we have in common. She loves books, but she likes different books from me. She loves clothes, but she doesn’t like wearing all the same things I do. (She also likes leaving her, and some of my, clothes on the floor, which gives me the vapours, but I digress.) Our convergences bring me joy but so, too, do our divergences. She is her own person, and getting to know that person is a delight and a privilege. She is constantly surprising me, testing and enriching my view of the world.

And that is the reality against which my childhood dream of “playing closet” with a confidant is unfolding. It’s fun and it’s challenging all at the same time because, unlike the imaginary sister I used to conjure up in my mind when I was young, my actual daughter isn’t always agreeable to playing by my rules. The things she wants to borrow from me are only sometimes the things I’m willing to lend, and almost never the things I would pick out for her. Her track record of returning things in a timely manner is spotty, and I expect it will only get worse with time. Occasionally, she asks for my opinion or help with her outfits, and sometimes she even implements it. I can foresee a day, in the not-so-distant future, when I’ll be on the receiving end of an (unsolicited) opinion on my outfit, and I am hard at work mentally preparing myself for that particular paradigm shift.

But I love it. I love seeing her explore her identity and her creativity. I love hearing her opinions, and the way in which she expresses them. It’s wonderful, and it’s bittersweet. She is my daughter and she is becoming herself. In the clothes we share, we have a common language. We are writing our story, but also our own stories. It’s not precisely what I had dreamed of, all those years ago — it’s infinitely better.

What I Wore: October 2024, part three

Details: Rixo dress, Amaryllis jacket, Chloe shoes, Anna Paola bag (all secondhand)

Thoughts: My social life is only occasionally exciting, so I make the most of my opportunities to dress up. A dinner with friends, with a side of drag show and burlesque, was definitely an opportunity not to be missed — sartorially and otherwise. This Rixo dress I recently thrifted at Goodwill seemed like the perfect bold choice. I chose the other pieces, including accessories, to complement the dress: leopard jacket, green bag. I used to wear opaque tights exclusively, but I’m currently digging sheer black nylons as a cool(er) weather practical accessory. At least until the snow hits, hah!

Details: Club Monaco vest, Zara blazer, Ralph Lauren skirt (all secondhand), J. Crew shoes (retail, old)

Thoughts: A layered, textured monochromatic brown moment. The longer vest/shorter jacket combo was a bit of a “climb out on a limb” choice, but I think it turned out quite nicely. And I took a further risk by choosing green, rather than brown, tights. I felt like the outfit needed something extra, and when in doubt, a pop of colour isn’t a bad bet — though, in this case, I didn’t want anything too stark or contrasting which might unbalance the colour palette.

Details: Club Monaco sweater, Michigan Rag Co jacket, Fossil belt, Dooney bag (all secondhand), Zara pants (retail)

Thoughts: I have collected so many wonderful coats over the years, it’s sometimes a challenge to find time to wear them all regularly. But I try to give each one at least one outing per season (and, of course, some get much more frequent wear) and it was time for my Bird Coat aka the Jessica Fletcher Special to make its fall appearance. It might not be my most versatile coat, but I love it so dang much! In the past, I’ve worn it with jeans, but I thought these brown Zara pants would be a nice alternative. TBH, they’re a nice alternative in a lot of cases … which is why I bought them. And I like to feel vindicated in my decisions, so here we are.

Details: Tahari shirt, Ports International blazer, Auxiliary belt, Liz Claiborne pants, Tommy Hilfiger bag (all thrifted), Mia shoes (retail, old)

Thoughts: I told you I would be wearing these white pants until the bitter end weather makes it impossible, and I am a woman of my word. Beyond the fact that they’re supremely comfortable and look great, it comes down to white. White is such a fabulous pairing for brown and blue — separately or together — and we all know how I feel about those colours. I don’t own a lot of white clothing (because I’m a klutz, I’ve avoided it for years) so I have to make the most of the items I do have. And if that means wearing these pants ad nauseam, well, so be it.

Details: Tahari jacket, Ralph Lauren skirt (both thrifted)

Thoughts: I love the Dior New Look vibe of this vintage jacket (probably 90s, but definitely retro-inspired) and I am forever looking for ways to emphasize it. My favourite swishy skirt plays the supporting role here nicely, I think. Bonus points for the green and blue palette, which never disappoints me. The overall energy here is what I’m calling Not-So-Dark Academia.

Details: Tommy Hilfiger shirt, Jones Collection sweater, Babaton pants, vintage belt, Ferragamo shoes (all thrifted)

Thoughts: I wrote about my fave colour pairings last week, and here’s another one of them: navy and dark green. With white as an accent colour, just imagine 😉

Details: Tahari tee, A&F cardigan, Fossil belt, Eddie Bauer pants, vintage shoes, Coach bag (all secondhand)

Thoughts: Super casual look, elevated with cool accessories. I thrifted this vintageish layered necklace and am obsessed with it as a subtle statement piece. Or is that an oxymoron? I know that piling on multiple delicate necklaces is trendy again, but while I don’t mind layering bracelets, I hate fussing with multiple necklaces. How do people keep them from getting tangled?? Anyway. A piece like this that does all the work for me? Genius. Love it. Also brilliant? These vintage shoes. They are definitely from the 90s, and my teenager self approves of them whole-heartedly. The square toe, the chunky strap, that gorgeous oxblood colour: what’s not to love?

What I Watched: Period Drama Boyfriends

If you watch as many period dramas as I do, it’s inevitable that you will start to have favourites. Favourite actors, that is. Or as I like to call them: period drama boyfriends. Period dramas are the reason I am utterly susceptible to men with English (and Scottish and Irish) accents, and over the years, I have racked up quite a few beaux. The thing you need to know about me is that I will trawl through a favourite actor’s filmography entry on Wikipedia and watch absolutely every minute of screentime that I can track down – good, bad, or indifferent. I have watched plenty of the latter two, let me tell you. As such, I consider myself well-qualified to provide a comprehensive guide to the best (and worst) performances of my fave period drama boyfriends, which I now offer to you in the spirit of sisterhood. Period drama lovers, unite! So, if you’re looking for some pleasant diversion, with a side of eye candy, this blog series is for you.

(Why yes, of course it will be series; the title should have given that away ;))

I’m going to kick things off with my number one Period Drama BoyfriendTM: Richard Armitage. Who earned that title, forevermore, on the strength of one, single performance … oh, but what a performance it is. Let’s break it all down!

We’ll begin with a bit of personal trivia, because why not.

Birthday: August 22 (a cusp baby, but we are claiming him as a fellow Leo)

Middle name: Crispin

Posh?: Despite the middle name, no. Armitage often talks about coming from a working class family, originally from Leicester. Fun fact: at 18, he joined the circus in Budapest in order to get his Equity card (necessary to work as an actor back in Britain). Further fun fact: in addition to acting and voiceover/audiobook narration (which I cannot recommend enough, he is fantastic), Armitage also writes fiction; his first book was published last year.

Height: 6’2 or 6’3, the internet cannot seem to agree. Regardless, a tall drink of water, if you know what I mean.

Now, let’s get down to (period drama) business!

Favourite period drama: North & South, which also happens to be one of my favourite period dramas, period. His John Thornton is one of my favourite romantic heroes, which is saying a lot because I was an Austen girlie for most of my adult life. I first watched N&S in 2020, and it changed my life. OK, maybe that’s a slight exaggeration. By rights, it’s not a story I should enjoy that much; most of it takes place in a (fictional) industrial town that looks depressingly drab, where mostly depressing things happen. I prefer my period dramas light and fluffy and nicely costumed. But all of those considerations are more than balanced out by the presence of John Thornton, who is a wonderful, complex hero. Thorton, a self-made mill owner, is flawed but, at heart, decent and steadfast; his slow-burn, enemies-to-lovers romance with Margaret, the female protagonist, provides some moments of exquisite angst and one of the most swooningly romantic kisses captured on film, imo. I re-watch the train scene at the end of North & South at least 2 or 3 times a year, and it never fails to give me butterflies.

Sexiest period drama role: North & South is very PG13, but if you want to see Armitage in head-to-toe “medieval” black leather and some sexy guyliner, try to dig up whatever bits of Robin Hood (the 2006 BBC series) you can find and enjoy the visual feast that is Guy of Gisborne, a bad boy who eventually gets something of a redemption arc though, sadly, never the girl.

Austen adaptations: none (sadly). If I had to fan-cast him for an Austen hero (and the year was 2010), I would probably go with Captain Wentworth. I think Armitage could have delivered an interesting version of stoic, repressed devotion.

Favourite contemporary role: The Vicar of Dibley’s last Christmas Special is one of my fave comfort watches; I throw it on any time I need cheering up. Armitage plays Harry Kennedy, the (not so boring) accountant from London who moves into the village and sweeps the Vicar (Dawn French) off her feet. Harry is such a delightful blend of dorky and charming – and, of course, looks like Richard Armitage, which doesn’t hurt – and his banter with the Vicar is wonderful. One of the things I love most about this 2-part special is that it features a plus-size woman as an object of desire for a conventionally attractive man, presenting it as a fact that requires no special commentary. Imagine this scenario in a North American sitcom, and think of how many lines of self-deprecating dialogue the heroine would be required to deliver. [In case you think this sort of attitude is a thing of the past, consider the media commentary around the most recent season of Bridgerton, calling it a “mixed weight” romance because the lead actress was, heaven forfend, not a size 4. And I’m not letting the show itself off the hook, considering how much focus was placed on Penelope’s “glow up” as a precursor to her HEA.] Anyway, back to the Vicar of Dibley: another great thing about it is that it’s a comedy – and an extremely funny one, at that – so Armitage gets to show off his comedic chops; they’re not half bad, which makes it all the more disappointing that he never had more of a run with rom-coms.

Honourable mention to MI5 as another contemporary performance worth watching – especially season 7 (Armitage’s first). The series as a whole is quite good (though it gets progressively less so over time, the writing being primarily to blame for that) and features an excellent cast overall. In the US, the show was called Spooks for reasons that escape me. As the name suggests, it’s a thriller about British spies running around and trying to foil various nefarious plots. Armitage plays Lucas North, one of the said spies, who harbours some dark secrets of his own. I will confess that I didn’t love the direction that his character started to take after a couple of seasons, and gave up watching, but that’s not a comment on his performance. Armitage can do broody, sexy, and conflicted in his sleep.

Least romantic role: Francis Dolarhyde (aka Red Dragon) in Hannibal. One of the best shows ever, but not for the faint of heart. Armitage delivers a very good (and extremely creepy) performance, but his character is second banana – basically a MacGuffin that serves to bring Hannibal and Will Graham back together for one (last? more?) glorious set piece. I will say this: Armitage definitely worked out a LOT for this role and … well, let’s just say, the show doesn’t hide it.

Murder mystery cameos: For someone who has been acting since the early 2000s, Armitage has a surprisingly small number of cameos in murder mystery shows – a staple of many a British actor’s filmography. He did appear in an episode of The Inspector Lynley Mysteries, playing a broody, sexy suspect, as well as the episode “Ordeal by Innocence” in Agatha Christie’s Marple (the 2007 version, not to be confused with the recent BritBox adaptation) in which he plays a rather sh*tty husband who may or may not also be a murderer.

Watch at your own risk: Armitage has made some questionable choices over the years – what actor hasn’t – and I’ve watched a few of them because I’m a glutton for punishment sucker for a tall, dark, blue-eyed hottie with a baritone voice that makes my toes tingle. Ahem. I might put the Harlan Coben adaptations from Netflix on this list but, while they’re pretty trashy, they’re generally entertaining in a lowest-common-denominator kind of way. There are a few other options, but I’m going to single out Brain on Fire which was essentially a made-for-TV movie that, inexplicably, managed to attract some actually decent actors who, despite their best efforts, were not able to transcend the soap opera-ness of the plot (something to do with a young, pretty, blonde girl who becomes afflicted with a mysterious illness). Armitage plays the protagonist’s concerned father, which marked something of a watershed moment for me personally. When your Period Drama Boyfriend starts playing dad roles, you know you’re getting old. Sigh.

Here’s a photo to make you me feel better:

Join the Armitage fan club in the comments, and stay tuned for the next installment of my Favourite Period Drama Boyfriends.