I feel like I’ve shown you this dress a million times, and let’s face it, there aren’t a million different ways to wear it. But I still love it, and this particular outfit does feature new shoes and bag, so you will forgive the unoriginality repetitiveness, yes?
I’ve typically worn this dress with flats before, because the hemline is a wee bit short for the office. I think it’s passable in this case because the cut of the dress is quite loose, and the neckline is very conservative, so the overall look is not particularly provocative. (Also, I have seen colleagues rock the shorter hemlines, so maybe I’m just the old fashioned exception.)
Speaking of old fashioned preoccupations, how do we feel about nylons? I’ve never been a huge fan of nylons – I refuse to say the “p” word – and that hasn’t changed, but I’m starting to feel quite strongly about their usage in the office. I know that some of you guys will vehemently disagree, but just as yoga pants have no place in the conservative office so, conversely, I feel like there is never an appropriate time to not wear nylons. If that rules out cute sandals in the summer, so be it. Go ahead, tell me that I’m hopelessly behind the times.
In other news, I hate my top knot/bun situation, but I’ve been struggling with work-appropriate up-dos for my current length of hair. Suggestions? Keep in mind that I have two left hands, limited time, and an aversion of excessive bobby pins (they give me major headaches). Oh, and also: tiny insect head syndrome.
Note: Thanks to a lovely reader, I finally managed to figure out how to add a Like (and Share!) button to every post. Hopefully this will make it easier for everyone to say “hi” without, well, actually having to say anything. Of course, comments are just bomb awesome, so keep ’em coming. Thanks, gang!
Sometime last fall, Vickie from Adventures in Fashion emailed me to ask if I would agree to having one of my Instagram OOTDs featured as a Simons #yegfashion photo of the week in a weekly feature run in conjunction with the Edmonton Journal. Of course, I was flattered and said yes. As a thank you, Vickie told me that I would receive a $50 gift card to Simons. There must have been some miscommunication involved, because I was expecting to see my photo featured somewhere in the EJ (print or online versions), and never did. I assumed that something had come up, and they decided not to run my photo, so I figured that the gift card was also a no go. And promptly forgot all about it.
A few weeks ago, I got an email from Simons reminding me about my gift card, still waiting for me, months later. Well, you might need to tell me about free money twice, but not thrice. As soon as I was able to talk my brood into heading over to WEM, I was on my way. (The kids are easy to convince, because Luka adores Galaxyland, and Teddy doesn’t really get a say, yet. The reluctant one is always their father, and probably for good reason – he’s the one usually stuck with shepherding Luka through the aforementioned G-land. The guy’s a saint.)
So, I don’t know how much you guys know about Simons, but let me start by saying: it is enormous. I say that as someone who is not daunted by thrift stores or Winners – Simons overawes me. Imagine the love child of Zara and Holt Renfrew (Nordstrom, for my American readers) and you’re getting a flavour of what Simons is about. Their in-house labels (Twik, Icone, Contemporaine) are varying degrees of trendy, at relatively affordable price points. And then you have the super luxe end of things; Simons carries everything from mid- to high-end designers (think DVF to Balmain, and back again). It is, honestly, a pretty unique shopping experience. Due to the sheer size, and my unfamiliarity with the store, it has always been (on the few occasions I’ve been there) a rather overwhelming experience, but if I had the time to get to know the store, I think it has a ton to offer.
So, armed with my $50 gift card, I went off to find myself something pretty. Let me stop here for a second and talk a bit about my approach to spending free money. I have two strategies: (1) buy as many things as I can; or (2) buy something I wouldn’t otherwise get with my own money. In this case, I decided to go with the latter approach. Although Simons does offer a lot of fairly inexpensive pieces, $50 wouldn’t cover more than a couple of them, and they would most likely be clothes. I decided against this, for two reasons. One, I’m trying to streamline my closet (the eternal goal), and therefore I’m being more critical than ever with my purchases. I’m not buying things just because they are inexpensive (or free in this case). Second, a lot of the clothes under the Simons in-house labels seem to me to skew a bit younger than my demographic. I think they could also be fine for someone my age but working in a creative, or less conservative, environment – or with a more interesting and active social life than mine. Simply put, I just wouldn’t have anywhere to wear some of the things I thought might be cute.
Now, whenever I decide to spend someone else’s money on something I wouldn’t buy for myself, my first thought is always “accessories”. Followed, shortly thereafter, by “bag”. Simons has no shortage of cute options in that category. For example:
I coveted this, hard. But at over $350, it wasn’t going to happen. And therein lied the rub. My $50 would cover a non-leather, non-designer bag, but not much else. Go big or go home is my motto when it comes to bags, so … it was time to try a different tack. Shoes. These Sam Edelman mules certainly got my attention:
Alas, at $150, they were still a no go. I mentally wishlisted these in case they end up at Winners at some point, and went back to my list. So … jewelry. Here, again, Simons offers the gamut from inexpensive mall costume jewelry (think H&M) to stuff like House of Harlow, and on to pricier designer wares. By this point in the excursion I was running out of time (and my companion’s patience), so I quickly scanned the display cases featuring the middle-of-the-price-range pieces, and lo – I spotted this:
I’m increasingly drawn to a minimalist aesthetic (say whaaa? I know!), and that includes jewelry. I’ve always hated wearing clunky bracelets (even if I like the look of them) because they interfere with my typing at work, so this Tai piece is both a style and functionality match. It is very delicate (featuring a darker blue glass stone in my case), and very light on the wrist, which I really appreciate. I tend to be wary of gold vermeil pieces because of the potential for the plating to wear off, but here’s hoping that doesn’t happen with this bracelet. Realistically, a similar solid gold version would run in the hundreds of dollars (or more), so I’m willing to take the risk with vermeil this time, just so that I can enjoy wearing this beautiful piece. At $69, it was a tad over budget, but I was happy to get it for $22 and change out of pocket.
And so ended my Simons afternoon adventure: happily every after (hopefully). Now, tell me: how do you spend free money when it comes your way?
Note: I wanted to add, in case it wasn’t clear from my post and in the interests of full disclosure, that I was never asked by Simons to write about their store, or otherwise “promote” them in any way in exchange for the gift card. I decided to write about my shopping experience because (a) my life is pretty boring, and this was kind of a funny story (maybe?), and (b) I thought it would be interesting to talk about different approaches to spending gift cards, aka “free money” (something I enjoy a great deal, hah!)
Sooooooo … I wasn’t a fan of this outfit. This is going to be a little bit difficult to explain. I think it actually looks very nice in the photos, and I think it worked in real life as well. The colours are flattering, the silhouette is beautiful (we all know how I feel about this Zara skirt), and it all looks nicely put-together. So why this face:
It just wasn’t comfortable. Having two layers tucked in made the outfit feel (if not look) bulky and fussy. And then there was the cardigan aspect. I used to love cardigans, but I’ve been gravitating towards blazers lately as they feel more professional, and I’m wondering if that also influenced my feelings about the outfit. It all felt a little … too girly. I’ve been doing the retro red-lips-and-big-waves thing lately (I blame Taylor and Lana, by the way), and while I think it can work at the office, it requires dialing down the girliness factor of everything else – i.e. the clothes.
In other news, I’m still obsessed with Rimmel Color Rush lip crayons, and have bought a bazillion new ones. Including my new favourite red; it’s much easier to apply than my old go-to (the Stila Stay All Day lip gloss/lacquer/whatever) and it has pretty decent staying power. If you haven’t’ already tried these crayons, what are you waiting for? Go now! Thank me later.