How Do You Fashion?

A comment from my best friend on an old OOTD photo that came up in my Instagram archive recently got me thinking about the ways my approach to fashion has changed since I started this blog back in 2010. Not the way my personal style has changed – though, whew, what a journey that has been, eh! – but, rather, the way I think about fashion itself. Let me explain.

When I started this blog, fashion was something very much Apart. It wasn’t even aspirational — it felt unattainable and, frankly, mostly irrelevant to my daily life. Oh, I was interested in clothes and dressing nicely. But after more than a decade of reading fashion magazines (from my teens through my 20s), I felt alienated by capital F fashion. I couldn’t afford it and, besides, why does a woman from a “backwater” city need to concern herself with what’s happening on the runways in Paris or New York? Reading about fashion was like reading about, I dunno, the Kardashians.

As I began to pay more attention to clothes, and began to be more invested (literally) in my appearance just as my professional career started to take off, things shifted a bit. I dipped a toe in the designer world – also literally. Designer shoes and bags began to be of interest to me. I never questioned this much at the time. It made thrifty sense; bags and shoes made out of leather can last forever (assuming proper care), they’re not vulnerable to size fluctuations or trend fluctuations, and so on. Looking back, I think this was a reflection of my general approach to fashion: it was still, to a large extent, a utilitarian thing, a tool. I used clothing to look nice and professional. I wanted clothes that flattered my body shape (relatively easy most of the time, since I wore straight sizes) and made me look polished. Conventional advice for the latter goal is: invest in good accessories. [Think about it: even men get told to spend more money their shoes, watches, etc.]

Sidebar here, but I think there was also a class element involved in this. I haven’t thought about it much, and maybe I’m way off-base. For what it’s worth, I think that “investing” in shoes and bags in particular was appealing to me, in part, because they were the most conspicuous status symbols available to me. I grew up poor, and didn’t start having much disposable income until my late twenties. Even then, I wasn’t making “big law” money, so I had to be strategic about my spending. Having a “good” bag seemed like the easiest way to elevate my mall brand outfits and achieve that “polished” professional look. There is a lot to unpack in that, including the very concept of what “polished” means and looks like, but that is another topic.

In the last few years, my approach to fashion has undergone something of a paradigm shift. I started to think about style critically; it became a form of creative self-expression. The next part did not follow immediately; in fact, I only became conscious of it in the last couple of years. What eventually happened was that I started to develop an appreciation for the “raw materials”, so to speak, of that creative expression. The clothes themselves.

The design. The workmanship. The overall vision of the designer, their aesthetic language.

Clothes became less of a utilitarian tool, and more of an art object. Some of my current favourites are, honestly, almost entirely the latter.

I stopped buying designer bags a few years ago (well, bags altogether for the most part), without really even noticing. They receded into the background of my outfits; became purely utilitarian. I have enough to last me a lifetime, and their design qualities don’t spark nearly the same level of joy and desire as clothes so … buying additional ones doesn’t seem like the best use of my discretionary budget. I’d rather spend it on a really beautiful Dries Van Noten dress.

I have also divorced myself from the concept of looking “polished” — which, I recognize, is a form of privilege in itself — and status symbols are less important to me. I am much more interested in making my own style statements, rather than adopting ones dictated by others.

Anyway, all of this is not to say that my current way of “doing fashion” is better or worse than my old way. It’s just different, reflecting my changing perspectives. Fundamentally, my philosophy hasn’t changed, really: invest in what maximizes your joy. As a sidenote, my fashion spending over the last 5-6 years (since I’ve been tracking it) has fluctuated very little; I know it might seem like I am a Buy All The Things kind of person, but I’m only that way about things that I’m obsessed with (whatever that might be at any given time) and otherwise quite frugal about everything else. I still love a balanced budget above all else šŸ˜‰

I am interested in hearing how others approach this topic, so please let me know in the comments: how do you do fashion?

What I Wore: mid December 2020

The Other Favourite

This outfit *just* missed the cut-off to make it into my year-end favourites list, and I’m kinda mad about it … even though the cut-off was self-imposed and arbitrary and hence, entirely my fault. But here it is, lost but not forgotten. I love this outfit so, so much. It’s peak Adina 2020 style. Come to think of it, this probably isn’t the year to immortalize, so if this style groove is here to stay for a bit, I will HAVE to come up with a different name for it. Anyway, it’s long and lean, and drapey, and all the muted colours … it’s the Artist in her new incarnation.

The Short of It

The previous outfit was the Long Carven (skirt), this is the Short Carven (skirt). Am I a bit obsessed with Carven at the moment? Maybe. Can you blame me? Surely not. I am also obsessed with aqua. Some might call it teal, but that word evokes a strong negative reaction in me; I associate it with that dark peacock blue/green that was popular at the mall a few years ago, and I Don’t Like That Colour! I don’t know why. It’s adjacent to colours I adore, like dark forest green, and aqua blue. Also, to be clear, “aqua” is also not turquoise. Or maybe it is, scientifically. But to me turquoise has less green in it, and is more saturated. Aqua is kinda like … if turquoise and mint had a baby? Or something. Anywaaaay. This skirt? Is a kind of blackened aqua. Look, there is a reason I am not a colour theorist. Well, two. One, I’m not sure that’s a real job. And two, I suck at describing colours.

But this is definitely NOT TEAL.

Pandering to the Masses?

I kiiiid, I kid. But this outfit *was* strangely popular on IG, which I did NOT predict. Listen, it’s a fine outfit. It’s cute and fun. I wouldn’t have chosen to wear if it hadn’t been. But it’s not my favourite in the same way as, say, the first outfit above. Its social media popularity is 100% IG f*ckery (long story short, IG just showed this outfit to more of my followers for “reasons”) but stuff like that used to have me questioning myself so much before. I almost didn’t include this outfit here out of spite, but that’s silly. So here it is. It’s cute and fun.

Christmas Eve-ing

Obviously, Christmas Eve this year looked very different from our usual. We did not get together with extended family. We did not get together with anyone. We stayed home, enjoyed some delicious Chinese takeout, and watched Home Alone 2. But I did dress up a little, anyway. It’s in my DNA, just as being forgotten by his family and fighting off burglars is in Kevin’s. We cannot help it.

The Platonic Closet, 2020

I first wrote about this idea back in 2016, and itā€™s an amusing mental exercise if youā€™re as obsessed with your closet as I used to be (Iā€™m still obsessed with clothes, but less obsessed with my closet, if that makes sense. I kinda just gave up on thinking about it as a thing requiring active planning, you know? It just … exists. Itā€™s a place I stash All The Things.)Ā 

Anyway, oneā€™s Platonic ideal of, say, a Dress of a Skirt is *not* the same as oneā€™s favourite dress or skirt. This is important. Itā€™s more a representation of all the key elements that person looks for in that type of item. You may not own an item that perfectly encapsulates that, but basically … the Platonic ideal would be the closest thing in your closet. 

Playing the Platonic ideal game can be useful if someone is at a stage where theyā€™re still trying to figure out what they enjoy and want to wear. Beyond that, itā€™s just for fun. I never took it too seriously (even back in 2016 when I was WAY more into overthinking absolutely everything) because … well, I hate anything overly prescriptive. Iā€™m the kind of person whoā€™s, like, ā€œletā€™s build a boxā€ and then proceeds to want nothing to do with that box because ā€œlet me live, please!ā€ 

So if at this point youā€™re saying ā€œhey, this useless exercise sounds like fun, letā€™s do it!ā€ and not ā€œwhat the hell did I just read, JFC!ā€ then, friend, you are watching the right stories šŸ˜Š Letā€™s, in fact, get started!

Dress

I donā€™t wear dresses as much as I used to. Like the moon and tides, my interest in certain categories of clothing waxes and wanes. Can you believe there was a period when I was super obsessed with pants?! Yeah, me neither … but the blog assures me there was. Anyway, this was an easier category to decide back in 2016, is all Iā€™m saying.  Speaking of 2016, this was my pick:

And now:

After much deliberation, I picked this Pink Tartan dress for the following reasons:

  • itā€™s midi length
  • Itā€™s body skimming but not body-con or tight 
  • Itā€™s got some cool draping and other interesting design details (which, sadly, are hard to photograph)
  • Itā€™s a plain enough pattern to mix with others, or wear with solid colours. 
  • No sleeves – good for layering. 

For what itā€™s worth, I still love the Phillip Lim dress. Its main drawback now is the length (wish it was longer).

Pants

Hahahaha! Ok but fine. 

Yes, I picked (faux) leather leggings as my Platonic ideal but hear me out. First of all, in the year of our Lord almost 2021, they definitely belong in the pants category. I think that dispute has been settled, yeah? Second, here are the pros:

  • comfortable 
  • stretchy
  • Did I mention stretchy and comfortable?
  • Look mildly edgy without requiring one to do anything more than breathe. 
  • Great for layering but can also be worn on their own because … pants. 

Blazer

2020 has warped my brain. I donā€™t get blazers anymore. Well, in theory, I guess I do. I just donā€™t wear them anymore so I really donā€™t know what I want from one. Basically, not to be a blazer. 2016 Adina would be horrified, Iā€™m sure:

This is more like it, though:


Here is what I like about it:

  • wool-silk blend = mind blown. Cozy but lightweight, non-scratchy. Perfect for home. 
  • Unstructured but with interesting design lines. 
  • Can be thrown over anything as an extra layer. 

Skirt

Ahhh. Finally, I could write an entire separate novel about The Skirt, but I wonā€™t because Iā€™m lazy and also thereā€™s no fame and money in that. Letā€™s have a look at 2016 Skirt:

Not bad. That was a good skirt. Too bad it doesnā€™t fit and itā€™s knee-length. What about 2020?

Now, again, remember we are not talking about my favourite skirt here. This is the Platonic ideal:

  • midi/maxi length
  • Body-skimming but not tight
  • Interesting design details
  • cool texture (in lieu of pattern)
  • Good quality material with some weight/drape to it

Shoes

This will surprise exactly no one. 

I almost picked my Birkenstockā€™s. I did. And then, I almost picked my leather sneakers. But while both are versatile, theyā€™re not quite as versatile as these shoes. 

  • flats, because duh!
  • Black (but a metallic would be equally appropriate)
  • Pointy toe because I am trend-regressive and I donā€™t care. 
  • Plain, black flats can be dressed up or down with basically any outfit. I picked the lace-up ones over a loafer, for example, because I think itā€™s more versatile for my personal aesthetic. 

Bag

Blame 2020 for yet another thing: making my bag collection superfluous. I donā€™t go anywhere, and my bag needs are limited. But letā€™s look first at 2016:

Cute. Not super exciting but a solid, versatile choice. And now?

I have, no joke, at least 3 of these small black crossbody bags and they are pretty interchangeable except for the difficulty of shoving in my iPhone 10. This Rebecca Minkoff bag scores highest on that metric, because itā€™s the largest of the bunch, so it wins the title. Here are the important elements:

  • Small, lightweight, can be carried cross-body
  • Fits essentials (credit card, phone, mini hand sanitizer)
  • Is black, goes with everything
  • The end 

For the record, this remains my favourite bag:

Thank you for checking in and reading my frivolous musings, today and all year. Happy holidays!