State of the Closet, Summer 2018

It’s been a while since I formally took stock of my closet, and since it’s the mid-point of the year already (how?), I thought it might be a good time for an update. Keeping up with Stylebook hasn’t been much of a priority lately, so I am going to try reconstruct a picture of the year to date from the Google Docs spreadsheet for recent purchases which I still update regularly.

First, the current content stats:

Tops – 30

Knits – 32

Blazers – 28

Trousers/jeans – 30

Skirts – 10

Work & casual dresses – 13

Special occasion dresses – 8

Outerwear – 17

Shoes – 43

Bags – 30

This illustrates pretty well my current preference for trousers over skirts. I am also in a transitional phase with dresses, where I’ve purged a lot of old favourites whose style/cut was no longer in line with my aesthetic, but I am still working on defining what styles do fit it. As a result, I’ve bought only a few dresses this year, most of them casual. This is the category where I struggle the most to break with my old Anthro-heavy vibe, so I am taking it slow. The Sarah Pacini dress I showed you the other day is a good example of something that works, but it’s the kind of piece that doesn’t turn up in thrift stores all that often.

My outerwear game is going strong, thanks to thrifting success, which has paid off handsomely this spring/summer. I now have coats for every occasion, outfit and weather condition, and I find that helps tremendously in feeling “pulled together” when I’m commuting to work.

Over the last few months, I have been slowly editing my shoe collection. The numbers have remained more or less consistent, but I have been adding new pieces (mostly boots and loafers) while purging my heels. Because one can never have too many reminders of one’s age and mortality (sarcasm font engaged), I have been experiencing a lot more aches and pains in my foot joints than before. Not surprisingly, this has significantly increased the appeal of flats to me; luckily, I feel that my new style lends itself nicely to flats, so not all is lost.

On the bag front, I don’t have anything too exciting to report. I thrifted a bunch of Marc Jacobs purses of various shapes lately, which I adore and use on constant rotation, and have largely ignored the rest of my collection. I’m not planning any major purchases (thrift finds excluded), and I find that I am moving away from using large and/or high-end designer bags. Part of that has to do with my (casual) work environment, and part of it is just practical reality; I am frequently commuting with a backpack now, because I carry my laptop with me, and if I’m going to carry a purse, it has to be something small, relatively casual, and easy to carry. A Louis Vuitton or Chanel bag would just look ridiculous. With that said, I am not in a rush to declutter my collection; who knows how things might change, and what my style/lifestyle needs might look like in the future. I’ve learned my lesson, which is not to part with any bag that would cost most to repurchase than what I originally paid for it. Since most of my designer bags were (not literal) steals, I’m hanging on to them for the time being. If nothing else, my daughter – who is proving to be a budding fashionista – will have something to play with in another 5-10 years.

As far as other numbers go, I’ve spent $1,340 on clothes and accessories so far this year; if it stays on the same track to the end of the year, then my 2018 spending will be lower than last year’s, continuing a 4-year decreasing trend. With the exception of 7 items (all but one of them being accessories), everything I purchased this year came either from thrift or consignment stores. On average, I paid just 5.5% of the retail value of my purchased items. Overall, approximately 85% of my working wardrobe is now thrifted. I’m pretty happy with those numbers.

What I Wore: June 26 – July 1, 2018

Something New

A98D5867-9C0D-42C4-A8D2-552F99AEDFD5

This was an attempt to “think outside the box” in terms of silhouette. I think I mostly pulled it off? It’s definitely a creative take on business casual; while my office is pretty chill when it comes to the dress code, I played it safe by wearing this on a Casual-Friday-adjacent Thursday. Did not get any perplexed stares, so I’m counting it as a win. The duster cardigan thing is one half of a Sarah Pacini ensemble I thrifted last year; together, the pieces have too much of a “Cathy on the moors” gothic princess vibe, so I’ve decided to separate them for now – though, someday, I definitely plan to go for the full effect. I paired it with a very basic top+trouser combo to keep things a bit more low-key. Here’s a close-up of the necklace, which is pretty neat:

Something Old

9F38F0C2-C7CA-42CC-8FA8-53719731270E

This is an “old Adina” dress, but it’s too nice to pack away. The rust coloured blazer nicely complements the grey, and picks up some of the colour on the floral print. I think this dress would be far more interesting with a different shape on the bottom – maybe a midi-length, tulip style wrap skirt. But, alas, I have no sewing abilities to speak of, and I’m also no fairy godmother, so re-designing a dress is outside my skill set.

Neither Borrowed Nor Blue

602E153E-B031-4619-8556-458ED5F7C234

I would be a far more successful blogger if I could manage to keep the punny title train going for at least an entire post. Oh well. I like this culotte outfit a lot, so you’re seeing it in lieu of anything blue. This is my take on “mom uniform” – linen culottes subbing for jeans, but otherwise basic and comfortable. The flats are the most comfortable; they’re a new-to-me brand (Me Too) but I love their aesthetic and their practicality. I think they’ll end up being my go-to walking flats this summer, as my beloved Kelsi Dagger loafers have kicked the bucket while my back-up pair by Jones NY is not far behind. Replacement of staple items is one of the downsides of thrifting, because finding a specific item is always a crapshoot, but I got lucky in this case — though I’m still on the look-out for another pair of loafers. For now, though, I will count this as a happy ending.

Happy (belated) Canada day!

What I Read: More Random Musings

It’s Friday, so you know the drill. This week’s edition of Random Musings, in lieu of anything vaguely book-related, is inspired by the Greatest Love of 2018 (So Far): Ariana Grande and Pete Davidson.

One

There have been a lot of think pieces in a very short time about BDE – what it is, who has it, who doesn’t. I’m down with this assessment of the Four Chrises; it’s gonna take me a while to digest the longer list here. (I most definitely do NOT have BDE — according to Buzzfeed, I’m at 50%, and that might as well be zero in this context.) But I have one question: if Rihanna has the most BDE ever – by popular consensus, it seems – what about Beyonce? The Rihanna vibe is very different from the Beyonce vibe. Does Beyonce have BDE?

Two

I think the public obsession with the Grande-Davidson pairing is baffling. Am I the only person who doesn’t think that it’s a big deal or unexpected that they got engaged approximately 6 minutes after meeting? They’re young, they’re in love, they’re rich, they’re not encumbered by regular people responsibilities. Why the hell not? I remember being in the throes of infatuation in my early 20s; had I had the wherewithal to act on my whims without thought of the consequences, I might have racked up a few post-haste engagements of my own. Do I think this is likely to last, to an actual marriage or beyond? Not really, but I’m not sure that’s the point; it’s certainly not my business to rain on these lovebirds’ parade. Seriously, though: can someone explain why the internet is losing its mind over this story? Is it simply because this particular couple has been pretty open about their feelings, and people are just getting irresistibly drawn into the whirlwind of their enthusiasm? Or am I missing something about Grande and/or Davidson that explains the obsession?

Three

Not to circle back to BDE, but I found it interesting that one of the more popular sub-topics in the Grande-Davidson genre is the “leagues of hotness” discussion. Grande is, again by popular consensus, several leagues of hotness above Davidson, and this is the kind of situation that apparently never not raises the question “how?” [insert obligatory eyeroll] In my experience, for men in Davidson’s position there are only two accepted answers: (i) money, and (ii) a big d**k. If the roles were reversed, the conventional answer would be … actually, I have no idea. I don’t think there is one, unless “he’s gay and it’s all just a fauxmance” counts as one. I get why people might not immediately jump to money being a, quote-unquote, explanation* for “non-conventionally attractive woman dates hot guy” scenarios; glass ceiling and all. But why does no one go, “she’s obviously just phenomenal in bed, duh”? Why is “he obviously has no sexual interest in her whatsoever” – in other words, the exact opposite – the go-to assumption?

[* No explanation is actually needed. What people find attractive is a long and infinitely varied list. Not sure why this is still noteworthy in the year 2018.]