On Authenticity and Blogging

As should be apparent by now, I have pretty much given up on the idea of being a “blogger”. I suppose you can call this blogging, but that’s only for lack of a better word. I am not an influencer, or a social media personality, or whatever the term du jour is. Yet, having occupied this space on the periphery of the blogosphere for over a decade (BCRL was not my first go at this particular rodeo), I feel like I am in this peculiar position of being neither/or – not really an insider, but not totally an outsider either. I find it fascinating, from my perch, to observe how blogging is evolving. The current buzzword is authenticity. Readers crave it. Businesses looking after their next marketing push want it. And bloggers are stuck in the middle, spinning their wheels.

I may be exaggerating.

Nevertheless, it is a challenging time to a blogger. There are lots of money to be made, sure – if you’re in the right demographic, with the right resources to get your foot in the door – but it’s also a tough business. Audiences expect a lot, often contradictory things. For example, you cannot get traction as a blogger unless you present an immaculate, careful curated image, but too much curation yields accusations of inauthenticity. The whole premise of blogging-as-a-marketing-business is founded upon aspiration; aspiration and authenticity are not natural bedfellows.

Have you ever read the IG comments of prominent bloggers? It is a very interesting experience.

What has stood out to me the most is the fact that any time a blogger presents content that betrays some less-than-generically-aspirational detail, they get a slew of negative comments. Some of those comments can be downright virulent. As a business trying to attract sponsors, this is not a good strategy. So I completely understand why bloggers retreat behind the blandest façade possible, trying to minimize blowback.

There is, I think, a correlation in many people’s minds between authenticity and relatability. Show me your messy room so I can feel reassured that, at some level, you and I have something in common. Which is fine, but do you expect Goop to be relatable? Do you expect Walmart to be authentic? When you are looking at a successful blogger you are seeing a business managing a million-dollar brand – themselves. (And, before you mention it, lower tier full-time bloggers are no different, even if their income bracket is. Successful blogging, in this day and age, takes a pretty specific path, and anyone who seriously aspires to that success knows it and will strive to pursue it.) Unless a blogger made his or her brand based on “I’m just like you” realness – which is extremely rare – accommodating an audience’s desire for authenticity can be a minefield. Socio-economic class issues alone would torpedo a good many number of well-intentioned bloggers.

I think businesses are getting savvy to these issues. Sure, some are only just now discovering social media, and their blanket sponsorships still end up splashed over questionable blog posts (fashion bloggers talking about their favourite, say, toilet paper – apologies to anyone who has written something like that recently). Others are starting to realize that the ROI very much depends on whether there is an alignment of brands between blogger and product. If a product is being marketed based on its aspirational value, it makes sense to hook up with a blogger who can add to the cachet (and vice versa). If a product is being marketed based on authenticity, a different strategy may be called for. To take a personal example: I never take beauty product recommendations from (monetized) bloggers; but I will try the s**t out of any (inexpensive) products recommended by other commenters on my favourite forums. Someday soon, companies will figure out a way to tap into these networks of small-i influencers and a whole new field of marketing will explode.

Authenticity in social media is hard for anyone, famous or not. You only have to look at something like Refinery29’s Money Diaries to see that. People absolutely tear apart the anonymous diarists over the dumbest s**t. (Honestly, there are days when I feel like the internet is basically the Judgment Olympics – a competition to see who can be the most righteous and judgy.) So whether you are a blogger or a nobody (and especially a non-anonymous nobody), there is very little incentive for laying out your entire life to strangers on the internet.

Which is too bad, because I love reading about the minutiae of other people’s lives.

This brings me to my obligatory expression of regret over the days of old. Indulge me, won’t you.

I grew up in a different, gentler era when people could post all kinds of navel-gazing, earnest crap online without fear of being engulfed by an avalanche of criticism, ridicule, or (much) worse. Ah, we were all much more innocent back then. Having grown up with a now bygone style of blogging, I still seek it out wherever I can. It survives in a few places (smaller blogs, mostly) and I cherish it now in a way I never did before. I’ve been guilty in the past of ragging on bloggers for what were, in retrospect, pretty minor infractions of what I considered “blogging etiquette”. I wouldn’t do that now because I have very little interest in running people off the internet anymore – whether I agree with them or not. I am obviously not speaking about people who espouse racist, sexist, or homophobic views; yet given how prevalent those remain, I find it increasingly easy to let other “differences of opinion” slide. Mommy wars? IDGAF how you raise your child, as long as they are loved, cared for, and (ideally) encouraged to become a productive member of society. Style advice? Hard pass – you do you, and I’ll do me, thanks. The same goes for any other aspect of daily life that lends itself to judgments that have nothing to do with ethics and everything to do with personal preference. I love reading about other people’s choices in these matters; I’m just not interested in debating those choices – theirs or mine. Unfortunately, most days I feel like I’m in the (silent) minority.

I am not sure that this post has a point … except perhaps to say: my, what a tangled web we’ve woven. People like to aspire, but they also enjoy having the opportunity to feel superior. They like pretty things, but they don’t want to be “sold to”. They want to genuinely connect, but they also just want their own value judgments mirrored at them. Bloggers trying to be all things to all people will inevitably fail, and will get mocked for trying. What’s the answer? I have no idea, man.

Style Avatar, Part One: The Prince

For context on this discussion, please see this post.

The Prince (work)

Key words: cerebral, poised, principled, efficient, elegant, enigmatic

Vibe: Minimalist, menswear inspired, tailored, architectural

Style notes: solid colours, menswear-inspired patterns, luxe fabrics, no frills, blazers + pants (mostly), interesting but subtle accessories

Favourite colours: black, dove grey, dark plum, cream

Never would I have thought I’d live to see the day when I would choose trousers over skirts (or dresses), but the day has arrived. If I am looking for something tailored, a trouser-blazer (or trouser-sweater) combo is my go-to these days.

Menswear-inspired clothing has always been a tricky proposition for me, because it sort of goes against my body type – a pear-ish hourglass. Sheath dresses and skirts would be traditionally considered more flattering for my body type, or at least more likely to highlight my “best” feature (waist-to-hip ratio). I do look good in those option, but as I get older, I find that dressing for conventional standards of attractiveness has, well, less attraction for me. I think that, in general, I have less patience for and desire to meet external expectations regarding personal choices. In fact, the opposite is true: it’s almost as if I enjoy thumbing my nose (politely, because the Prince is always polite) at those expectations.

For many years, menswear was also largely ruled out by my love of florals and bold colours. This is not to say that the two cannot mix but, generally speaking, florals are typically paired with more feminine-leaning clothes. I still love my colourful prints, but I am learning that I can appreciate them without wearing them. Not all of them, anyway. I am now starting to express my love in other ways – by taking up embroidery, for example.

For each of my style character, I have tried to pick an individual (real or fictional) who embodies the spirit — though not necessarily the aesthetic — of that persona/avatar. The Prince gave me the most difficulty because, while I have a very clear image of who he is, I haven’t been able to think of a perfect representation in popular culture. There is some elements of Westley (Princess Bride) but with a darker edge, though not quite Machiavellian all the way. Maybe if Westley and, hmm, Snape had a baby, we would be getting closer to it

Anyway, here’s some inspo:

5C9E22B3-7600-4BA7-B1DE-37F28F76956E

9613C081-32A2-4359-A6B8-41DE23436D0B

C9D4D5D6-EED4-41AC-A986-310A5A84D9BD

FF3F01A4-C4E7-4952-9F6F-80D8E96F33DB

And are some past outfits that would be in the right ballpark:

187B4AD8-71CF-4362-9DEB-7B81495999B0

8CC3D56D-F5A8-4848-8C35-0CA0A8CDA007

A63FE639-335A-4BDD-9541-4B28AB77A5A4

I Did A Thing, vol. 4

My name is Adina, and I am a beauty product junkie.

Not, like, Sephora VIB Rouge-level beauty product junkie, but let’s say … a burgeoning beauty product junkie. I’m generally a cheapskate when it comes to consumable items, including cosmetics and such, which, in the past, has held me back from experimenting madly. With age, vanity is slowly winning out, so I have been dabbling at increasing price points.

Case in point: I finally caved and bought that damn Dr. Jart Cicapair cream. $60 – ayiyi! Alright, let’s do this!

[That is a fairly literal transcript of my inner monologue as I hit the order button on the Sephora website.]

Because once the dam breaks, the flood comes, I also splurged on a small bottle of the Pixi Glow Tonic ($20CAD). Baby angel skin, here I come!

You know how people say “I applied such-and-such product for the first time before bed one day, and the next morning I woke up looking like an extra dewy Gigi Hadid”? Yeah, that didn’t happen. I mean, my face didn’t melt off or anything, so that was all fine and good. Only not really different from the day before.

In the interests of fairness, I took a “before” picture and then continued to use both products for another month or so. I didn’t need to take an “after” picture. Don’t get me wrong, my skin looks pretty good. It just doesn’t look noticeably different than before. The only things I noticed during that month were the subtle changes in my complexion depending on my hormone cycle. While I don’t experience huge acne flare-ups, my skin does get a bit rougher and more prone to blemishes at certain times of the month – even using the same products consistently. What I realized was that my current regimen is probably as best as it can be, or as good as it needs to be. Short of cosmetic procedures, this is as good as my 37-year old skin is going to get. My inner beauty product junkie is a bit disappointed, because that means that there is really no need for me to keep trying new products. Whomp whomp.

So what about Cicapair and Glow Tonic?

I liked them both. I will be perfectly honest and say that I’m not inclined to buy Cicapair again, simply because of the price and the fact that, for my skin, CeraVe moisturizer works just as well. I did not notice a significant change in my skin tone; then again, my skin was probably less uneven (or prone to redness) than I thought. Cicapair does feel very nice on the skin (and I did not mind the slightly medicinal smell) and I like it a lot as a daytime moisturizer under my make-up. It absorbs quickly and doesn’t leave a sticky residue. So, for now I will continue to use my existing tube happily. When I run out, we’ll see. If I ever experience really dry, flakey skin, I might be more tempted to turn to Cicapair as a more intense moisturizing option over CeraVe.

I have been using Glow Tonic together with the remnants of my CosRX Sol A toner as a 1-2 toning punch on evenings when I don’t apply my retinol. I prefer that combo over using The Ordinary’s salicyclic acid, for example. I don’t know if Glow Tonic is better than TO’s lactic acid (which I use every morning), but it’s more easily accessible because I can buy it at the drugstore down the street. At $20, it’s not inexpensive, but it costs about the same as the CosRx toner, which I can only get on Amazon (with month-long waits). So I am inclined to re-buy this when it runs out.

In case you are wondering, here is my updated skincare routine:

AM: TO lactic acid, Cicapair cream, Biore sunscreen

PM: cleansing wipe, CosRx Sol A toner, Glow Tonic, TO Buffet, CeraVe // or // cleansing wipe, retinol, CeraVe (3 times a week)

A few other things:

– I randomly tried Pixi’s H2O Skintint recently. I say “randomly” because I found it (unopened) for $8 at my local consignment store (they have a beauty product section). I bought it because I was curious to try more Pixi products after my Glow Tonic experience, and … did I mention I’m a cheapskate? Skintint normally retails for $34CAD, so I jumped at the chance to try it out for a fraction of the price. I really like it! It’s kinda like a BB cream? Most days I can wear it on its own, instead of my usual Jane Iredale powder foundation; some days, I will add the powder on top for extra coverage/matte-ness. Does it make me look like an extra dewy Gigi Hadid? Mmmm, well, not really Gigi-esque, but maybe a little bit dewier than usual? I dunno, I just really like it, ok? One small pump is enough to cover my whole face, so I think the tube will last me a while. I would love for this to be a re-buy for me, but the price does give me pause. I will see how long this tube lasts and make a game-time decision.

Here is a side-by-side: bare face, “I woke up like dis” Adina and post-everyday-make-up (featuring Skintint) Adina.

4B97835F-98BF-456B-BB25-0D012C5D7A49

– I had very dry hands back in February, and I stumbled onto a “cure” that worked wonders: Elizabeth Arden 8 Hour Miracle cream + CeraVe. You guys – it’s magic! The skin on my hands went from sandpaper to baby’s bottom in 3 days – applying once, at night, before bed. I have been singing the praises of EA’s Miracle cream for years, and I will tell you again that you need this in your life if you’re dealing with flakiness/dryness. Just don’t use it all over your face – unlike the Cicapair, I found that the Miracle cream can clog pores. (Nose is fine; I use it on my nose whenever I get a cold to prevent my skin from cracking .)

That’s all she wrote, but if you guys have tried some cool products recently – I’m all ears. Old habits die hard, what can I say.