This blog might not be good for much, but it’s a workable excuse for all kinds of self-indulgent projects because … blog content, amirite? Anyway, I love an excuse to “experiment” with “science” so blogging it is. Those scare quotes are there for a reason, by the way, because what I’m going to talk about today is actually more in the line of playing around with skincare. But that doesn’t sound nearly as cool, sigh.

You may recall that, a few months ago, I busted my skincare budget when I decided to splurge on some Dr. Jart Cicapair Tiger Grass Cream. I like the cream a lot, but maybe not $60 worth of a lot. I started to look around for a plausible dupe and, lo, I found not one but two. Sort of.

First, L’Oreal definitely jumped on the centella asiatica bandwagon with Revitalift Cicacream. This usually sells for about $30CAD at Shoppers, which is half the price of the Dr. Jart cream, but still on the high side for me. One day, I found it on sale for under $20CAD, which is when I decided it was worth trying. For science, you understand. (Also because, as we have established before, $20 is the magical number my threshold for impulse buys.)

The second product I decided to try was the Roche Posay Cicaplast Baume. This actually does not contain the same active ingredient as the Dr. Jart cream, though the name sounds similar which is what drew me to it in the first place. I’ve done exactly zero research into this (which is, come to think of it, par for the course for my “science experiments”), but I think the “Cica” comes from cicatrice – the French word for “scar”. Both creams are supposed to aid in healing damaged skin, you see. The Cicabalm was around $20CAD (regular price) at Shoppers; for what it’s worth, you can also get it on Amazon for around the same price, and it has very good reviews.

My experiment went something like this: I switched from using the Dr. Jart cream (every morning, after my lactic acid, and before sunscreen) first to the Roche Posay, and then to the L’Oreal cream. I gave each new cream a month’s trial; I figured this would be long enough to see any effects, differences, etc. And? I’m sure you are on the edge-of-your-seat excited to hear about the results. Well … sorry. The truth was that I really didn’t see any real difference among the 3 creams. All 3 worked well as moisturizers for my normal-to-dry skin. I experienced no adverse effects, though I also saw no dramatic change.

With that said, here are my (subjective) impressions:

I *think* I like the Dr. Jart cream the best, though the Roche Posay is a close second. Oddly, I think I like the slight medicinal smell of the Dr. Jart cream and its consistency (more balm-like). Also, it’s green. The Roche-Posay smells nicer, though not in a skincare-fragrance sort of way. It’s lighter and absorbs more quickly than the Dr. Jart. The L’Oreal cream is the one that feels (and smells) the most like a typical face cream. I don’t hate it, but I also don’t feel like raving about it, if you know what I mean.

What’s next? Since I am nowhere close to finishing any of my current tubes, my plan is to use the Roche-Posay and L’Oreal creams through the summer and fall, then switch to the Dr. Jart in the winter because I find it a little bit heavier (and, in my mind, slightly more moisturizing). When the time to re-purchase comes, I think I’m going to go with Roche-Posay. I like it a lot, it’s easily accessible, and it’s relatively inexpensive (at $0.50/ml, it’s cheaper than the other two: Dr. Jart, $1.20/ml; L’Oreal, $0.60/ml).

If you’ve done any “experimenting” of your own recently, and have some good discoveries to share, let me know in the comments.

Grey Matters

I raved about these Cartonnier trousers last week, but here we are again. They are great! This is the grey version, obvi. Thrifting well-fitting pants is not easy, so I’m still thrilled to have scored TWO pairs for under $20. I’m less enthusiastic about the top, which I got at my last clothing swap; it has some cool details – love the pockets – but it’s also kinda finicky. I’m not crazy about the collar, and while the tie detail is intriguing, it also hits at a tricky spot (it covers the waistband of a medium rise trouser, but only just). I am also not sure about how the silk-like poly fabric will wash ‘n wear, and I’m generally not a fan of fussy materials. So, the top is in limbo but I did really enjoy this outfit.

All About the Bag

It’s been a long time since I took out one of my designer bags for a spin. I think it’s a function of my current casual work environment and extended commute. Anyway, last week I felt a nostalgic urge to pull out one of my old lovelies, and I figured that a weekend would be my best bet. It’s not so much that my weekends are anything but casual; I just have fewer practical constraints to consider, plus it’s easier to pull off this sort of high-low outfit because, well, on weekends I’m in IDGAF mode. So then … Louis Vuitton bag and distressed jeans? With a fringe vest? And leopard print shoes? Sure, why not.

Pea-coquette

Am I reaching with that pun? A little? Alright. Anyway, the outfit is solid. The weather has been flirting with slightly cooler temps (high teens, low twenties Celsius), which can be tricky – is it spring? Is it summer? – but on the other hand, also an excuse to just throw a sweater over everything. I am all about that, as you know. I am not as fond of bright colour combos as I used to be, which means that black is the default pairing for this mint green; not the most innovative combination, but certainly workable. Sleek (black) loafers complete the “lewk”. Loafers, I’ve come to believe, are the perfect shoe. They look polished but effortless, which is to say – they don’t look like they’re trying too hard. They help your outfit to adjust to any milieu. If your outfit is verging on being underdressed for the occasion, they say “look, I’m not beholden to your dress code, but I tip my hat to it”; if your outfit is fancier than it needs to be, they say “hey, I know the rest is kinda extra, but that’s just my natural flair, I’m actually totally chill”. Did I mention they’re comfortable AF? Loafers for the win.

1. Clothes Are Not An Investment

Let’s start with a definition: an investment is something that is expected to grow in value over time, or generate profit over and above the initial outlay. 99% of clothing fails that test right out of the gate. Even clothing bought with the expectation of long-term wear is not an investment; it’s a consumable. I might be a collector at heart, but I am also a realist about clothes. They are much more similar to, say, food than they are to stocks; you need them to go about your day, but almost all of their value is their immediate function.

My experiences with the secondhand market have demonstrated, over and over, that the vast majority of clothes, no matter how expensive to begin with, have terrible resale value. Thrift stores would not be replete with like-new designer items if there was money to be made there. Some people argue that there are exceptions – brands that retain or even increase their value over time. While this may be true in some sense, realizing a profit requires a lot of specialized knowledge. You need to know not only the brands in question, but also the specific items, styles, models, etc. that will have the best resale value because not every product is made equal, even when you’re talking about labels like Hermes, Chanel, Louis Vuitton and the like. And even then, unless you’re a professional reseller with a global reach, making a profit can be hard. Most luxury consignment storefronts, which is an average person’s best bet for selling these kinds of items, will charge anywhere from 40-60% of the sale price as commission. You can do the math on how much an item has to increase in value over the purchase price before it’s realistic to expect a profitable sale.

2. Brand Names May Be A Signal, Never A Guarantee Of Quality

Sorry to break it to you: if you’re relying on brand names alone to find quality clothing, you’ll be led astray as often as not. Quality varies wildly across brands sold at similar price points, and even within a single brand. As consumers, we have precious little insight into the manufacturing process, so relying on labels as a signifier of quality is a gamble because you can rarely be sure that a higher retail price means higher manufacturing costs (i.e. better quality) – it could just mean that the brand is charging a higher margin purely for its name. In my experience, many mid-tier designer brands fall into this category; their actual quality is not appreciably better than stuff you would find at the mall, nor are the designs themselves more special.

3. You Can Become Your Own Quality Expert

The good news is that if you keep thrifting, you will quickly learn how to spot quality on your own. Good fabrics feel different; well-cut clothes sit differently on the body. You can literally see the difference in good versus mediocre finishing, if you pay close attention to everything you see. People who join me on my thrifting trips always comment on my speed; I rarely spend more than an hour in any thrift store, and I consider that a leisurely pace. Most of the time, I don’t look at every single item on a rack. I’ll scan the rack and reach out to touch certain fabrics that look promising; often, I will also scan labels, to the extent they’re visible. I will always stop and have a closer look when I see a designer label I like; just as materials that feel nice to the touch, it’s a signal that there may be a worthwhile item at hand. Sometimes, the material lies; I’ve come across some deceptively silk-like polyester in my time. Sometimes, the label doesn’t live up to its promise. Trust your instincts. If a piece of clothing doesn’t feel “quite right” the first time you try it on, leave it behind. Chances are that it won’t get better with time, and eventually (sooner rather than later) you’ll get tired of trying to “make it work”. I learned that the hard way.

4. Actually, Forget Brands; Wear What You Like

There is some irony to this; I spent years learning about and hunting for brands, only to eventually realize that what truly matters is how you feel in the clothes you wear. If you think that’s an intuitive lesson, then you probably didn’t grow up poor. I did. Growing up, shopping at the mall was a luxury far beyond my reach, but I could scrape together enough money for a monthly issue of Marie Claire or Vogue. I got the message loud and clear; I would be a more confident, attractive, happier person if I could wear designer labels. “Some day”, I thought. To be honest, that day might never have truly arrived if I had not discovered secondhand shopping. That opened up a new world of possibilities, and I certainly pursued them with a vengeance. But after finally getting regular exposure to designer pieces, I slowly came to see that a fancy label wasn’t like a magic lamp; it wouldn’t transform me into something else, for better or worse. Eventually, I started to follow my own instincts and find pieces that made me feel like the best version of myself. Some of them carry fancy labels; some of them don’t. Don’t be afraid to experiment. Thrifting is a good way to go about it, because it’s at arm’s length from the fashion industry so you’re not limited by current trends or (arbitrary) price points.

5. Fast Fashion Is Not Sustainable 

Thrift stores are overflowing with clothes. All day, every day. Most of those clothes are the products of “fast fashion” – mass market retailers, high and low. The clothes that end up on the racks of thrift stores are a fraction of what gets donated, which itself is only a fraction of what is produced. I’m sure you’ve heard that the clothing industry is the second most polluting industry in the world; visiting thrift stores regularly, you get a real sense of the scale of consumption going on. I don’t know what the answers are; cheap clothing is a problem, but wealth inequality is no less real. (Threads like this one provide insight into both sides of that debate.) I do think it’s an important conversation to keep having, because I think that’s one way that we may, incrementally, move towards finding a solution.

As always, I would love to hear your thoughts, so hit me up in the comments!