Wedding Belle

Dress, Adrianna Papell (thrifted); shoes, Louboutin (thrifted)
Dress, Adrianna Papell (thrifted); shoes, Louboutin (thrifted)

The older I get, the more I love weddings. I don’t know why that is; perhaps I am getting more sentimental with age. Weddings are a wonderful opportunity to connect with my extended “community” — family and friends I don’t see regularly — which I probably miss more than I realize until, well, a wedding comes up. Of course, wedding are also great opportunities to (a) dress up; (b) eat buffets. I love both of those things, in more or less equal measure. I also love dresses which allow me to eat buffets.

This Adrianna Papell number is a good example of that kind of magical unicorn dress. See, it *looks* form-fitting but it’s actually surprisingly forgiving. I don’t know what kind of witchery that fabric is, but it skims the body without being too body-con OR constrictive. And no Spanx were involved in the making of this outfit. Score!

plum crush
plum crush
details
details
feeling fancy
feeling fancy

The whole outfit cost less than $100, which I also count as a victory because there is nothing like looking champagne fancy on a beer budget. The dress and shoes are thrifted, the necklace is an antique mall score, and the clutch is vintage. It used to belong to my grandmother. I don’t have a lot of family (fashion) heirlooms, so I treasure them. This sparkly clutch is surprisingly modern too; it’s nice to think that I might pass it on to my daughter one day … or maybe wear it to her wedding. But that’s just my sentimental side talking.

all the ruching
all the ruching
from the back
from the back
wedding belle
wedding belle

What I Read and Watched: Mixed Bag Edition

Let’s start this week on a wholly unpromising note. Not one but TWO DNFs, aka Did Not Finish. The first was Love All by Elizabeth Jane Howard. I really enjoyed her Cazalet saga, but I couldn’t get into this book long enough to even tell you what it’s about. I think there’s a girl who gets dumped by her married lover just as she’s quit her job to be with him (or something?!), so she goes to mope at her aunt’s house, who happens to be a landscape architect for some rich guy, and then a bunch of other characters are introduced and … nope, that’s all I remember. Moving on.

Factory of Cunning by Phillipa Stockley started off strong, and held great promise. It’s a loose sequel to Dangerous Liaisons, and follows the adventures of a character based on Mme de Merteuil after the events of the original novel. The book is set in England, where Mrs. Fox/Mme de Merteuil is on the run/in hiding. Dangerous Liaisons is one of my fave books, so I was initially excited to read the story after twigging on to this subtext. (Disclosure: I just randomly found this book in my library and I have no idea how it got there. I tend to indiscriminately adopt books that other people discard, so that’s probably how. I like the surprise element.] I will give this to the writer: she did a good job with the tone and language. Nothing brings me out of a story more quickly than anachronistic dialogue. So I’m not really sure why, half way through the book, I just lost interest. All of the interesting characters were terrible people, and all the decent people were boring characters. I love a good anti-heroine, and Mrs. Fox/Mme de Merteuil certainly had potential to be one, but then the plot became too convoluted for its own good, and I found myself not caring enough to keep track of its various strands. I won’t lie; I totally skipped to the end to read the denouement. Out of context, it made no sense so I still have no idea what really happened, but I also have no desire to go back to finish the story.

My two cents: go and read Dangerous Liaisons.

And a further two cents? I think the book is due for a new screen adaptation. Neither of the two legit adaptations I’ve seen (we’re not counting Cruel Intentions here) managed to give us a great Valmont. John Malkovich was creepy and not sexy, while Colin Firth was sorta sexy but a bit of a vanilla villain. Come at me in the comments? But seriously, let’s talk fantasy cast. Aidan Turner? Fassy? Who is your Valmont?

Speaking of Aidan Turner, Being Human was another bust for me. I tried to get into it for about 3 episodes then gave up. I loved the idea of the premise, but the actual show was too angsty for my current liking. Basically, I wanted it to be something more in the vein of Misfits, humour-wise. Oh well.

I did binge watch Chewing Gum, and cannot recommend it enough. It’s full of wonderful quirky characters, and quirky humour, and I loved every minute of it, and I loved (girl) Tracey so, so much. My favorite character arc was her sister’s, though, which says a lot about the (great) writing on this show because Cynthia starts off as the character I was least interested in. I really, really hope there will be a third season, because I NEED to know what happens to everyone. I am totally rooting for Tracey and Connor, the world’s unlikeliest Romeo and Juliet.

I also watched a few episodes of Black Mirror. I really enjoyed “San Junipero” and “Be Right Back”, though they were both bittersweet in a way that feels a little too much for me right now. Whenever I’m stressed out, I basically can’t handle complex emotions.

Lastly, a couple of interesting articles. First, Refinery29 looks at the true (new?) way that the fashion industry works these days. Second, Buzzfeed makes a case why everyone’s (old) TV boyfriend was actually a jerk.

And that’s it for me for this week. Happy Friday!

Checkmate

Blazer, Liz Claiborne (thrifted); top, Theory (via consignment); jeans, Paige (thrifted); shoes, Kelsi Dagger (thrifted); bag, Coach (via eBay)
Blazer, Liz Claiborne (thrifted); top, Theory (via consignment); jeans, Paige (thrifted); shoes, Kelsi Dagger (thrifted); bag, Coach (via eBay)

I don’t know what I’m even doing with these post titles anymore. Sorry. Maybe I should call them all, like, Outfit Post NumberWhatever and save myself the extra brain bandwidth. Do you know those days when you just end up staring at your computer screen for 10 minutes only to realize you lost your train of thought 9.5 minutes before? Yeah, it’s one of those days. On the plus side, I think this was a cute outfit which probably deserves a better blogging effort on my part. Tough break for Cute Outfit; life’s unfair like that.

In case you’re hungry for details — yes? let’s pretend — everything here is old but remixed in a totally new way. Well, sorta. I’m pretty sure I’ve blogged this exact outfit before, except with a different blazer, and not even that long ago. But the blazer makes a difference, and this definitely looks fresh and new. (Just go with it.) It’s a cool blazer, and you might be surprised to know that it’s Liz Clairborne. That’s a, well, “mom” brand, isn’t it? I mean, I’m a mom so it should not surprise me that I would like something from LC, and yet it kinda totally does. My inner monologue goes something like this:

Me: But I’m not a regular mom! I’ve totally heard of Acne and Reformation and 1/3 of my closet is Aritzia. I’m a cool mom!

Also me: Yeah, sure. Aren’t we all.

The End.

But also me: Cool blazer, bro.

The (real) End.

shades of navy
shades of navy
casual friday simple
casual friday simple