The One Where I Find Gold At The Thrift Store

I am not burying the lede with this title, guys. This is possibly my most literal blog title ever. I would usually aim for some surprise element to justify making you read umpteenth paragraphs of my rambling, but I decided to go for clickbait instead. If you’re still reading this, I guess it worked. Now, don’t run off; grab a snack and settle in for the full story of how I found gold at the thrift store.

I didn’t go looking for it. There are many things I actively look for in thrift stores, from the not very specific (plain black lace-up loafers) to the fairly specific (Hermes scarf, Diptique candle, Anthro mugs) to exact items (a pink felted wool Marni top I saw online once). Gold has never been on my list because I assumed that any donated gold, which must be pretty rare to begin with, would get price-jacked six ways to Sunday. I mean, I recently saw a DVF dress priced at $90. It wasn’t even a particularly nice dress. This is also the reason why I don’t bother looking at thrift store “showcases” – the locked displays where they put the “nice stuff”, i.e. the items that thrift store staff consider to be high value. (Which, more often than not, means crappy counterfeits of designer bags but I digress.) I tend to stick to the regular racks, and that is where, in my experience, the real treasures are to be found.

Since finding some Alex & Ani bracelets at Goodwill last month, I have been mildly obsessed with adding to my bangle collection. I now make a point of scouring the costume jewelry displays in each store I visit, in the hopes of finding more of these bracelets. So far, no dice … but it’s how I came across this necklace:

6AB95A7A-B039-4967-8D1D-DBD4F8F0112E

It was mixed in with a jumble of other necklaces, mostly trash, and it’s a small miracle than I even spotted it. What drew my attention to it in the first place was the chain. The links were perfectly formed and delicate – not what you might expect from junk jewelry. I looked for a dog tag thingie around the clasp that might indicate a brand name, but there was none. Because I was in a rush, and still had the rest of the store to go through, I decided to take the necklace with me and investigate more later. As it happens, I didn’t end up finding anything else of note on that trip. I was trying to decide whether it was worth going through the line-up at the till for a single item when I noticed a very small marking on the link next to the clasp. It was too small for me to see clearly what it said, but I was sufficiently intrigued to take a chance on the necklace and buy it. I figured the $3 spent on it would provide a learning opportunity if nothing else.

And, boy, it did.

The first thing I did when I got home was look for a magnifying glass. We didn’t have one, but lo! there’s an app for that. Such is the wonder of life in the 21st century. With the assistance of my iPhone, I deciphered the markings on the necklace; by then, I had realized there were actually 4 separate ones, inscribed on different places around the clasp. They were, in no particular order: AND, Italy, 585, and 14K.

AND was a non-starter for obvious reasons — you try googling that — and Italy was self-evident. The quickest research informed me that “585” is European shorthand for 14 karat gold, which checked out. However, it turns out that “14k Italy” is a not infrequently counterfeited mark; who knew? Mine appeared as two separate markings but I decided I couldn’t take them at face value. So I turned to science.

There are several ways to test gold at home, ranging from the impractical (no, I don’t have nitric acid handy, thanks) to the suspect – more on that in a moment. The first test I tried was the magnet test. Gold is not magnetic so it should not react to a magnet. One of my bracelets has a magnetic closure which is strong enough to attract other (metal) bangles to it; I tested the necklace against it and … nada. I also tested the necklace against the magnet in my Marc by Marc Jacobs bag, which seems to be industrial strength; again, no reaction. So far, so good.

According to Google, gold is quite dense. (This did not inspired confidence in me because the necklace was pretty light. With that said, my one other gold necklace – purchased at Tiffany, so I know it’s legit — is also fairly light so *shrug*) Gold is supposed to sink to the bottom of a glass full of water, while fake gold should float. I must have been doing something wrong because literally everything I dropped in the glass, sunk immediately. Hmm.

I was too chickens**t to try pouring vinegar on the necklace, a somewhat more practical alternative to the aforementioned nitric acid test. I also didn’t want to scratch it — it was in perfect condition, no dark spots or scratches, which was another point in favour of it being real gold — so I decided to try some more non-invasive testing.

The weirdest test of all was the foundation one. There’s a YouTube video, in case you’re interested. I followed the instructions and smeared a bit of foundation (don’t think it matters what kind) on my arm. After the foundation dries, you’re supposed to rub the gold item over the skin (where the foundation has been applied) – if it leaves a black mark, it’s real gold. If it’s fake, no mark. I thought this was nuts … until I saw the black mark on my arm. It was more like a dirt mark than pitch black, but you get the gist.

Things were looking good, but I was still not satisfied. After more desultory internet sleuthing, I eventually gave up and took the necklace to a mall jewelller for confirmation. They were kind enough not to charge me for checking it out, which is good because …

… never mind; trying to do a last minute fake-out in a blog post is quite beyond my narrative skills. The real lowdown? The necklace itself is 14k gold, while the horsebit pendant is gold plated. The gold plating is quite thick apparently, which is probably why it reacted to my home tests the way it did (or not). I didn’t want to shell out for a proper apppraisal, since I don’t plan to sell the necklace, but I think it’s safe to say I copped a good bargain for $3.

8C6E6CE0-6B7D-4FD4-A513-C6BEFADC7F29

And that, my friends, is the story of how I found literal gold at the thrift store.

What I Wore: July 16-22, 2018

90s Throwback

51C13AA2-EBED-4E70-B983-84FE96B4FAF2

To be clear, I am referring to my outfit, and specifically the vintage Jones NY skirt, and not my own self. We would have to throw back a lot farther if that were the case. Ba-dum-tish. Did I mention that I’m turning 38 in, oh, one week’s time? I don’t feel a day over 22, and I am always slightly mortified when I think about the disconnect between how I see myself and how others see me. So I try not to think about it, which seems like the only sensible solution.

Anyway, the outfit. I don’t know how old this skirt is, but it has a 90s vibe to it which makes it “on trend” with the current revival of that decade. The trendiness isn’t what attracted me to it, though it’s always nice to feel even accidentally fashionable; I have been moving away from pencil skirts lately and looking for new silhouettes. Midi and maxi skirts intrigue me, and the details of this particular skirt are very good. It’s minimalist, but not dowdy – that’s a stealthy slit that comes up past the knee – and the quality is excellent (fully lined, 100% lightweight wool). Keeping in line with my Artist persona, I paired the skirt with a relaxed fit, chambray-like Theory top, and a structured blazer for contrast. The chunky necklace is from Chico’s, of all places, but we’ll just pretend it’s Anthro or something, mkay?

Autumn in July

F985D292-0C03-40A5-9480-B41EA5CA4EA9

The weather has been all over the calendar lately; it’s hot one day, cold the next, and sometimes it’s hot and cold all in one day. My office AC is another matter, and only slightly less unpredictable. Don’t take this as a complaint, because anything that isn’t winter is a good thing in my books, but it’s been a weird summer. Which explains as much of this outfit as can be explained. Actually, it was a very weather-smart choice; the jacket was perfect for the chilly morning, and the sleeveless shell was perfect for the office temps. The top covers enough of my shoulders that I don’t feel too exposed without a topper. I do love the full, blazered effect because it’s got that professor vibe I love – I’m calling it “the Adventurer goes to Oxford”.

Prairie Chic

A1980897-83FE-4315-887F-9A410D4A19D9

This is one of those divisive outfits that you’ll either love or hate. Needless to say, I fall into the first camp. This Wilfred dress was a recent thrift score; it’s 100% cotton and I adore everything about it. Rather that pile on more volume – though it’s only a matter of time before that happens, fyi – I decided to dig up this old Tabitha cropped jacket and go for a sorta Neo-Georgian-by-way-of-Little-House-On-The-Prairie effect. Remember Pride and Prejudice?

Who wore it better?
Who wore it better?

Seven Years

3083B1D6-D8DD-45AA-9574-4C11D0784C5F

That’s how old my son is. Seven years. Does not compute. He’s only about a foot shorter than me, and some days he looks (and acts) like a teenager and I. Just. Cannot. Compute. Does it ever became more plausible? Like, am I going to be looking at him in 20 years’ time and wondering how it’s possible that he is my son – that small, wrinkly, little bean they put in my arms at the hospital one day?

Leaving aside the existential questions, this was the outfit I wore to the celebratory dinner. Per the birthday boy’s request, we went to Boston Pizza – he is only 7, after all. This linen Lord & Taylor dress was perfect for the occasion, though I’m not sure it wouldn’t be perfect for every occasion. It’s literally a big sack, but it’s also somehow the most flattering shapeless thing ever. I’m also quite madly in love with these Barbara Barbieri sandals. I don’t own any other high heeled sandals, but these are very comfortable, and the spikes add a bit of edge.

I Did A Thing, Vol. 8

It’s been a hot minute since the last time I wrote about my crafting adventures, and you guys must be dying for an update. No, it’s okay, you don’t have to rush to affirm my suspicion. Imma go ahead and give you that update anyway.

I go through phases with crafting, as with reading. Lately, I’ve been on a knitting kick. As I’ve written before, I have struggled far more with learning how to knit than I did with embroidery; I don’t find it as intuitive. Because I’m a contrary sort of person, the challenge is making me double down on knitting in this case – as opposed to give up, which is an equally likely response on my part to recreational endeavours that don’t go the way I want them to. Anyway, I’m knitting all the time, and I am determined to eventually make a finished product with which I can be 100% satisfied. I’m not there yet, but I’m moving slowly in the right direction.

I have learned a few basic patterns/stitches in the meantime, including garter, stockinette, ribbing, seed, rice, moss, star stitch, and Chinese weave. In the course of my struggle with seed stitch, I finally learned how to read my stitches, which has been a tremendous help. I would like to experiment more with slip stitch patterns, but for now, I am focusing my energies on the aforementioned quest to make some sort of useful product.

I did make a striped scarf, which didn’t turn out too badly.

98D8AD0F-6966-4DA9-AAB5-C9C7DD1D5341

Making one of sufficient size – I like my scarves to resemble blankets, really – takes a long time, but it’s not difficult. I could just stick to making these in perpetuity (there is an almost infinite number of colour combinations to pursue) but how many scarves does one woman – and her nearest and dearest – need? Finding simple patterns online for making non-scarf items has been challenging. I bought a book of patterns, but later realized that they were all either too advanced for me (all the ones I liked, basically) or not quite my style. There was an exception; I did use one of the easier patterns to make a very nice scarf for my husband.

4BC6E0BA-F53D-453E-92FA-68C775409286

My own pattern-making skills are laughable, so I haven’t tried anything too adventurous. This was my first attempt at an envelope-style clutch:

ADA01833-9999-4E87-80F4-04016AEF900C

For the record, this was supposed to be done in seed stitch, but I messed up – which is what happens when you try to follow online instructions, and also don’t know how to read your knitting. Anyway, I think the rib stitch works just fine for this. I added a snap and a decorative brooch (an old beading project) and was not wholly displeased with the result.

My most recent attempt at a self-made pattern was an obi-style wrap belt. To back up, I learned a bit about increasing and decreasing by following a headband pattern I found online (this one). Here’s a pic of that project:

4D9D3805-42DA-4374-9E78-B1984177A696

I used a slightly modified approach to make my belt. On the ends, rather than increasing by one stitch every other row, I increased by 2 (one at each end of the row). The body of the belt was done using a star stitch pattern; I mostly eyeballed the width, and the nice thing about this type of design is that it can be customized pretty easily.

153A1274-5136-4146-A6A2-D8C676CB31E4

The hardest parts to make were actually the ties; I braided them out of the same yarn as the rest of the belt, but then decided to get fancy and add beads at the end of each “tassel”. Threading them onto the yarn was a total pain in the you-know-what. Still, I think the result looked pretty good.

A94083B6-37C3-4D45-8C9F-3A2A228643F3

C44B6E9F-C52F-46F0-A20B-9404B29C21C1

That about sums up my recent knitting adventures. If you have easy (and free) patterns to recommend for my next project(s), leave me a comment!